Note: If you attended this session live and received credit, you cannot attend the on demand session for additional credit.

Nothing is more daunting than finding oneself in the middle of an ethical dilemma and struggling to find a solution.  In rural practice, this is exacerbated by challenging ethical scenarios that are perhaps not taught in urban training centers.  Rural clinicians are often left to resolve conflicted feelings and clinical dynamics on their own or with limited resources.  Much has been written in the professional psychology literature about ethics and decision-making models.  Many of these contributions have taken an absolutistic approach, clarifying that what is, and is not, acceptable behavior by clinicians. and is measured by strict adherence to statutes, guidelines, policies, and rules. Others have taken a more relativistic approach, emphasizing that context is crucial and that "ends justify the means."  Less has been written about psychologist’s self-awareness of core values and how this influences ethical decision-making approaches.

This presentation begins with the concept of a self-reflective approach to ethics and the practice of clinician self-awareness in assessment of ethical quandaries and, ultimately, in the resolution of such dilemmas.  The presentation will highlight the value of self-reflection and adherence, or non-adherence, to a set of personal and professional core values about what is morally right, and will identify a variety of potential threats to successful resolution of complex ethical conundrums, particularly in rural settings.  Through enhancing self-awareness of one’s core values, this presentation will support clinicians in practicing a proactive approach to ethical dilemmas.  As a rural based example, this approach will be explored in the context of a vignette related to multiple relationships.

This session is at the intermediate level and is designed for psychologists and other mental health professionals.

Course Objectives
1. Apply the concept of clinician self- awareness of personal and professional core values that prepares participants to analyze factors which influence ethical decision making, including client factors, personal factors, organizational, and professional factors.
2. Identify two threats to good ethical decision making related to difficulties with our own self- awareness and self –reflection.

This session qualifies for 1.5 continuing education credits. You must attend the full 1.5-hour program to get continuing education credit for the event.

The Minnesota Psychological Association is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. The Minnesota Psychological Association maintains responsibility for this program and its content. 

This program is approved by the National Association of Social Workers - Hawai’i Chapter (Approval HI62792020-108) for up to 1.5 Social Work continuing education contact hour(s).

This program was cosponsored with: APA Committee on Rural Health; Illinois P.A.; National Association of County Behavioral Health & Developmental Disability Directors; National Association for Rural Mental Health; Hawaii P.A.; Minnesota Association for Marriage and Family Therapy; Southwest Virginia Psychology Doctoral Internship Consortium; Kansas P.A.; Indiana P.A.; Southern Illinois University